Comparative analysis between three methods for calculating the stability of compressed bars

e393

Authors

  • Yoan Manuel Ramos Botello Universidad de Granma
  • René Misael Arias Hidalgo Universidad de Granma
  • Agustín Telmo Pérez Peña Universidad de Granma
  • Yennys Cuscó Varona Universidad de Granma

Abstract

A structural element must not only satisfy specific strength and rigidity requirements, but it must also be stable. To calculate the stability of compressed bars, it must be defined which method to use based on the cross section of the column, material, how it is fixed, and length. In the present investigation, the objective is to compare the methods of Yasinski and J. B. Johnson and the Finite Element Method (FEM) for the calculation of this type of elements. To do this, three types of bars were considered, each with three variants. Once the results were obtained, they showed that there is not a great difference between the Yasinski and Johnson methods. The latter is the most conservative and secure of the three, while the MEF is the least conservative.

Published

2025-03-21

How to Cite

Ramos Botello, Y. M., Arias Hidalgo, R. M., Pérez Peña, A. T., & Cuscó Varona, Y. (2025). Comparative analysis between three methods for calculating the stability of compressed bars: e393. Revista Cubana De Ingeniería, 15(3). Retrieved from https://rci.cujae.edu.cu/index.php/rci/article/view/928

Issue

Section

Original Articles